THE PROGRESSIVE REVIEW - May 17, 2018
Did you miss an issue? You can read every issue from the Gophercentral library of newsletters on our exhaustive archives page. Thousands of issues, all of your favorite publications in chronological order. You can read AND comment. Just click GopherArchives
*-- Supreme Court allows states to legalize sports gambling --*
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday struck down a law banning sports betting nationwide, effectively ending a prohibition on a $100 million industry.
Monday's ruling makes sports wagering legal, and strikes down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992, a federal law that required states to prohibit gambling.
The case, Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, challenged the government's authority to "impermissibly commandeer the regulatory power of States."
By a 7-2 vote, the high court said the federal law violated constitutional principles against the federal government controlling state policies. It unconstitutionally mandated states to prohibit sports betting under their own laws, the ruling said.
"Congress can regulate sports gambling directly, but if it elects not to do so, each state is free to act on its own," Justice Samuel Alito wrote for the majority.
"The legalization of sports gambling requires an important policy choice, but the choice is not ours to make."
New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie challenged the law, saying it violated the Tenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.
"A great day for the rights of states and their people to make their own decisions," Christie said in a tweet. "New Jersey citizens wanted sports gambling and the federal Gov't had no right to tell them no.
"The Supreme Court agrees with us today."
New Jersey had hoped to legalize sports gambling to collect additional taxes.
The American Gaming Association had estimated bettors would wager $10 billion on this year's NCAA men's basketball tournament alone.
The federal law that banned betting barred the practice in 46 states. Nevada, Delaware, Oregon and Montana had been exempt because they were grandfathered in by laws that existed before 1992.
Missed an Issue? Visit the Progressive Review Archives