Subscribe to GIZMORAMA
 
Subscibe to DEAL OF THE DAY
 


Gizmorama - January 10, 2018

Good Morning,


Is the ozone healing? NASA has seen it. Now, Gizmorama is sharing it.

Learn about this and more interesting stories from the scientific community in today's issue.

Until Next Time,
Erin


P.S. Did you miss an issue? You can read every issue from the Gophercentral library of newsletters on our exhaustive archives page. Thousands of issues, all of your favorite publications in chronological order. You can read AND comment. Just click GopherArchives



*-- NASA offers first direct evidence of ozone hole healing --*

New satellite data has offered the first direct evidence of a slowdown in ozone depletion.

Using a special instrument designed by scientists at NASA's Jet Propulsion Laboratory in California, the agency's Aura satellite has measured declines in the concentration of ozone-killing chlorine. The reduction in chlorine has led to a decrease in ozone depletion, allowing a slow but steady recovery of the ozone hole.

In 1976, scientists first showed the use of a class of manmade chemicals called chlorofluorocarbons, found in aerosols, refrigerators and other appliances, was leading to heightened levels of ozone-killing chlorine in the atmosphere.

In 1986, an international ban of CFCs was signed by 46 nations. The latest research -- published this week in the journal Geophysical Research Letters -- suggests the ban is working.

"We see very clearly that chlorine from CFCs is going down in the ozone hole, and that less ozone depletion is occurring because of it," lead study author Susan Strahan, an atmospheric scientist at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, said in a news release.

Chlorofluorocarbon compounds have a lengthy lifespan. When they rise to the stratosphere, they are broken down by ultraviolet solar radiation, releasing chlorine, which eats away at the ozone layer.

The ozone helps protect Earth and its inhabitants from harmful radiation. In the 1980s, researchers measured worryingly low concentrations of ozone above the poles, confirming the predictions of previous CFC studies. The research spawned the idea that the hole was forming in the ozone layer, and inspired international action.

Previous studies have used measurements of seasonal changes in the size of the ozone hole to gauge impact of the CFC ban. The newest NASA study is the first to survey the chemical composition of the ozone hole and show a reduction in ozone depletion as a result of declining levels of CFCs.

Since 2005, NASA scientists have used the Aura satellite to measure ozone depletion rates during the winter months.

"During this period, Antarctic temperatures are always very low, so the rate of ozone destruction depends mostly on how much chlorine there is," Strahan said. "This is when we want to measure ozone loss."

Scientists were also able to use Aura's instruments to link the decline in ozone depletion with reductions in chlorine. Chlorine is difficult to measure, but when it's run out of ozone to eat, chlorine molecules react with methane to form hydrochloric acid, which is easier to measure. By measuring hydrochloric acid levels each fall, scientists were able to gauge the amounts of chlorine in the ozone hole.

Their analysis showed ozone depletion has declined by 20 percent over the last two decades.

"This is very close to what our model predicts we should see for this amount of chlorine decline," Strahan said. "This gives us confidence that the decrease in ozone depletion through mid-September shown by MLS data is due to declining levels of chlorine coming from CFCs. But we're not yet seeing a clear decrease in the size of the ozone hole because that's controlled mainly by temperature after mid-September, which varies a lot from year to year."

And while CFC levels are in decline, some scientists say other ozone-depleting chemicals are increasing, slowing the ozone's recovery. Last year, scientists at Leicester University measured an increase in concentrations of atmospheric dichloromethane, a short-lived, ozone-depleting substance and a popular substitute for CFCs.



* Computer vision and motor tests predict who can hit a baseball *

The latest research out of Duke University Medical Center suggests baseball scouts could be replaced by computers in the not-too-disant future.

A series of computer-based vision and motor tasks performed by baseball players predicted which test-takers were most likely to excel at the plate. The tests were taken on large touch screen computers called Nike Sensory Stations. Those who scored highest were more likely to earn better on-base percentages, more walks and fewer strikeouts.

"There has been a data revolution in the game of baseball over the past decade with the introduction of technologies that track the speed and movement of every pitch, the location of players in the field, and other tools that can quantify player performance like never before," Kyle Burris, a statistician and doctoral candidate at Duke, said in a news release.

Burris and his research partners had professional major and minor league baseball players complete nine different tasks testing eyesight and motor control. Several of the 2D video-game-like tests had participants track and touch shapes with their finger as they moved across the screen. The researchers compared the results to the players' performance during the season.

"We found positive relationships between several tasks and performance for hitters, but not for pitchers," Burris said.

The tasks also failed to identify a correlation between performance and slugging percentage. In other words, players who scored highest on the tests were more likely to have better plate discipline than their peers, but they weren't more powerful.

For years, teams have used visual and motor-skill training to improve batting performance, but there's little evidence to suggest the training methods work. However, the latest research -- published this week in the journal Scientific Reports -- proves the tests are useful to identifying ability.

"We can't say there's a causal relationship between higher scores on the tasks and performance in games, but there was an association in the real-world data we evaluated," Burris said. "Regardless, this information could be useful in scouting, as well providing possible training targets to improve on-field performance."

While it's still not clear whether visual and motor skills can be improved through training, researchers believe next-generation testing technology like the Nike Sensory Stations will help them find out.

"In the past five years or so, we've moved to a digital realm where there are all kinds of new tools that provide new context for training, such as virtual reality, perceptual learning video games and brain training," said L. Greg Appelbaum, a cognitive neuroscientist at Duke. "The Sensory Station is one such device that can be used to link visual skills to on-field performance and provide information to individuals about how their skills compare to peers who might play the same sport and position at the same level."

***

Missed an Issue? Visit the Gizmorama Archives