Gizmorama - February 10, 2016

Good Morning,

New research has suggested that the Earth might actually be the end result of a two planet collision. With the vastness of space you would think there would be plenty of room for all planets. All kidding aside, this does sound intriguing.

Learn about this and more interesting stories from the scientific community in today's issue.

Until Next Time,
Erin

P.S. Did you miss an issue? You can read every issue from the Gophercentral library of newsletters on our exhaustive archives page. Thousands of issues, all of your favorite publications in chronological order. You can read AND comment. Just click GopherArchives

***
*-- New evidence suggests Earth is product of two-planet collision --*
WASHINGTON - New evidence suggests Earth's beginnings involved a massive collision between itself and another planet, Theia, forming a chimera that is the Earth as it is known today.

A new study published in the journal Science from the University of California, Los Angeles suggests Theia -- a "planetary embryo" at the time -- collided with Earth far more violently than previously thought.

The blow caused Theia and Earth to completely combine, causing both the planet and the subsequent moon to have virtually "indistinguishable" molecular properties and a uniform geological signature, researchers said.

Prior to the study, it was widely accepted Theia's supposed side impact disintegrated the planet, causing pieces of it to form the moon. The new study suggests the two planets instead had a head-on collision, forcing them to combine.

"We don't see any difference between the Earth's and the moon's oxygen isotopes; they're indistinguishable," said the study's lead author, Edward Young.

"Theia was thoroughly mixed into both the Earth and the moon, and evenly dispersed between them," Young said. "This explains why we don't see a different signature of Theia in the moon versus the Earth."


*-- Deep-sea 'purple sock' offers clues to early evolution --*
PERTH, Australia - Scientists in Australia have found four new deep-sea worm-like species in the Pacific.

They belong to the genus Xenoturbella and look like empty socks -- which is why one of the species has been dubbed "purple sock." Scientists say the strange and antiquated creatures offer clues as to what early life on Earth looked like and how it evolved.

The almost-worms were captured in the Pacific Ocean off the coasts of California and Mexico using remotely operated submersibles. The four species -- Xenoturbella monstrosa, Xenoturbella hollandorum, Xenoturbella profunda and Xenoturbella churro -- are described in a new paper published this week in the journal Nature. Xenoturbella monstrosa is the purple sock.

First discovered in 1949, scientists have been utterly confused by the sock-like animals. They are incredibly simple; their limp bodies host no brain, gills, eyes or reproductive organs, just one hole for food to go in and waste to go out.

Researchers knew it ate mollusks, but that was about it. For a brief period, scientists thought it was a mollusk of sorts after finding mollusk DNA inside the deep-sea creature.

"It was first described as a flatworm, and then confused with molluscs for a while. Increasingly sophisticated DNA analyses placed them as closely related to Deuterostomes (which include sea urchins, sea squirts, and humans), or to being closely related to Acoel worms," lead study author Nerida Wilson, a senior research scientist at the Western Australian Museum, explained in a news release.

Previously, scientists thought Xenoturbellas evolved from more complex organisms, reverting to simpler strategies for survival. But the discovery of four new species has helped reposition the group on the tree of life and the evolutionary timeline -- confirming that the worm-like creatures were always this basic.

"Our results confirm that Xenoturbella are closely related to Acoels, and that together these are the sister group to both Deuterostomes and Protostomes, which include arthropods, molluscs and annelids," Wilson added. "This means that the basic body features they have were always simple, and not secondarily simplified over time. This helps us interpret how complex features evolve."

***
Missed an Issue? Visit the Gizmorama Archives