Gizmorama - November 26, 2012
Good Morning,I'm going to keep things short. I'm still stuffed from Thanksgiving. But, please enjoy all interesting stories from the scientific community found in this issue.
Until Next Time,
ErinP.S. EVTV1 is back and better than ever! This video portal was created to weed through the online clutter to bring you the best animal video clips...funniest videos...most popular...PLUS the most unusual. New videos are added daily! It's the future of entertainment available today, all in one place.
Visit and Enjoy: EVTV1.com****-- Microsoft sued over Surface tablet memory --*LOS ANGELES - A Los Angeles man who bought a Microsoft Surface says he's suing the tech giant because the tablet doesn't provide the claimed amount of storage space. Attorney Andrew Sokolowski said he discovered the Surface does not have the 32 gigabytes of storage Microsoft advertises because the operating system and pre-installed apps take up almost half of the tablet's memory. Although Microsoft has acknowledged the tablet's limited free storage capacity in both the 32 gigabyte and 64 gigabyte versions, and lists the free-space capacity on its website, Sokolowski has filed a lawsuit with the Superior Court in Los Angeles seeking class-action status. Sokolowski isn't seeking damages but wants Microsoft to stop what the lawsuit terms a misrepresentation of the Surface's features and offer refunds to buyers of the tablet, his lawyer said. "Mr. Sokolowski's lawsuit is about protecting consumers as we head into the holiday shopping season," Rhett Francisco, an attorney representing Sokolowski, told the Los Angeles Times. "Microsoft is misrepresenting the storage capacity and capabilities of the Surface tablet, and consumers should know about it." Francisco acknowledged Microsoft admits the Surface has less than the advertised free space but said, "If you go through the Microsoft site, you're not going to find it." "You have to know about these issues and know about this lawsuit in order to find information," he said. Microsoft said it believes the lawsuit is without merit. "Customers understand the operating system and pre-installed applications reside on the device's internal storage thereby reducing the total free space," a Microsoft spokeswoman told the Times.
*-- Most distant galaxy yet observed --*GREENBELT, Md. - Astronomers using two NASA space telescopes say they have set a record for finding the most distant galaxy seen in the universe. Combining the power of the space agency's Hubble and Spitzer space telescopes they have created an image in which the farthest galaxy appears as a diminutive blob that is only a tiny fraction of the size of our Milky Way galaxy. However, it offers a peek back into a time when the universe was only 3 percent of its present age of 13.7 billion years, NASA said. The newly discovered galaxy, named MACS0647-JD, was observed as it appeared 420 million years after the big bang, and its light has spent 13.3 billion years traveling to reach Earth. MACS0647-JD is so small -- just 600 light-years across -- it may be in the first steps of forming a larger galaxy, astronomers said. "This object may be one of many building blocks of a galaxy," study lead author Dan Coe of the Space Telescope Science Institute said. "Over the next 13 billion years, it may have dozens, hundreds, or even thousands of merging events with other galaxies and galaxy fragments." The researchers say they hope to use Hubble to search for more dwarf galaxies at these early epochs, which if numerous could have provided the energy to burn off the fog of hydrogen that blanketed the early universe, a process called re-ionization that ultimately made the universe transparent to light.
*-- Calif. rejects seismic test at nuke plant --*SANTA CRUZ, Calif. - The California Coastal Commission has rejected Pacific Gas & Electric's proposal for off-shore seismic testing near the state's only operating nuclear facility. The commission that oversees the California's 1,100-mile coastline decided the proposal to use of air guns to send acoustic pulses across the ocean floor near the Diablo Canyon nuclear power plant didn't meet stringent coastal protection rules. "It's a high bar, and we don't feel like the questions of alternatives and analysis to minimize and perhaps avoid the impacts here have been [answered]," executive director Charles Lester told the Santa Cruz Sentinel. The testing had been intended to uncover information about known fault lines in the offshore area near the plant to provide scientists with a better idea of the seismic risks. The proposed testing had been opposed by environmental groups and by commercial fishermen worried it would would impact their industry. The project could have had considerable environmental impact, wildlife experts said, because marine life relies primarily on sound rather than sight and the acoustic onslaught could silence whales, disrupt foraging and force mammals from the testing area. "It is sound that marine mammals and many species of fish use to communicate, to mate, to find food, to do many things that they need to do in the wild," Michael Jasny of the Natural Resources Defense Council said. "It is difficult to imagine a worse location environmentally [for the test] than this particular area."
***Missed an Issue? Visit the Gizmorama Archives